HIDE DOBs (Reblogged)


Salam.

7/4/17

REMOVED BOTH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, PRESENTED TO ME AFTER HARRASSING THRUOUT THE WHOLE NITE OF 8/4/17. RITE NOW IN A KILLING MODE WITH THE SAME HARASSMENTS N EVIL CHANTS ( OPPORTUNIST DEVIDE N CONQUER SHYTWAN SAYS - AFTER THE EVIL CHRISTIAN? SAYS I MUST WRITE EVIL CHRISTIANS ON THE SABBATH MONKEY DAYS)


CTNA VISITING CARDS
UNT ADDRESS N FONS


Who knows which one is the "source code" of these mindless, inconsequenctial  human lives thinking absolute aitheists.


Salam.

07/04/17

Some wud say its nothing but an exceptional coincidence. Keep on saying.......

America does sorcery w/o a trace. It uses humans for evil gains n then simply gets rid of their other than themselves n "belonging to others" traces. That unknown evil everyone can hav a sixth sense about n that is enuf for shytwan to promote this evil nation its biggest hope ever to extinguish anything or everything that glorifies Allah n currently it is only islam n its followers muslims. For no apparent reasons (most hav nothing at all to do or connect with usa) they seem to b scared to talk about after they hav uttered a few words about an evil they agree, hate n wud luv to c punished. Phenomenol work by shytwan in creating shirk in the mind where "only fear Allah" gets replaced by an evil nation which is unjustly killing muslims n lying blashphemouly against islam.

They hav not only the edge of technology but also blessings of shytwan to use the technology for sorcery. Each n everything linked to telecomm n cyber world is heavily loaded with evils. I hav seen the proves but i can't produce evidences, like all other sorceries they r transgressing with. Using #s seems to be very important for the evil to work. I m presenting wot I discovered about myself that they had set up:

Our residence fon # when i was studying in usa 316 7.......
Then the # changed (relocation, still here Mashallah) ..... 269 5
This # changed by btcl with a new # ..... 526 95
My ctbank fon # (when ctcorp) was 955 0067, the 2nd # was pabx
It was changed to (when ctgroup) to this # 966 6741
During the whole time the treasury banking telex # was 671 546
My current two sim #s ....867 7....... & .....675 2......

Y 67 is following me around? Similarly 5 seems to be another tracer for evils!

Allah has warned in the Quran on using #s for evil purposes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RELIGION MADE IN WHITE HOUSE FOR MUSLIMS

Image
23/11/16 edited 17/01/17 Salam. Unabated torturers now since 2 of them r extremely.in luv with each other & their sodomy is being celebrated by their evil jinns thru clever foul mouthing n extra powerful tower bridge acts. 2day the basters were in the patriotic bonday Mataram act when I helped (?) the hypocrits with the video: Then they got finally ticked off 2day after 2 days of being "unable" 2 download from utube Islmic hamd n naats for the bakground theme. More "upset" 2 c the country they want 2 hide not being in the list of utube countries. Then anger erupted 2 the legal challenge from a petty bhogoban requesting 1 liner memo 2 Iblis like complain. The 1st post copy removed. Revenge of the nerds: My apologies 2 those who hav good taste n hates haram, but remember u can't get rid of this vicious n filth fast destroying all sorts of good from this earth smooth evil if u don't know the total ugly face of these
Read more

Dialogue - We Need Extra-Ordinary Imams

Image
02/03/18 A CLASSROOM IN GAZA NON HIJABI MUSLIMAHS BREAKING: CRA to save net neutrality has been introduced https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/3a5ebfe9-980a-46fb-97f8-626128a2139b Reposting after 28/2/18 bcoz: Quite a few important lines disappeared with shrewdly showing continuity of writing. The topic is both hijabi & non hijabi women showing themselves in media, public & elsewhere - aren't they both considered unveiled? According to law when a crime is committed it dosen't look at the dress of the alledged criminal, rather it looks at the circumstantial evidences, witnesses etc. to find out whether a person is guilty or not within the laws applicable. The topic is both hijabi & non hijabi women showing themselves in media, public & elsewhere - aren't they both considered unveiled? According to law when a crime is committed it dosen't look at the dress of the alledged criminal, rather it looks at the circums
Read more