POSSESSED!!!

Salam.

14/4/16



A BIG 1 MISSING LESS TO NONE HOMOSEXUALS

THE 2ND 1 MISSING LESS 2 NONE SORCERER POPES, PMS N PRESIDENTS

THE 3RD 1 MISSING LESS 2 NONE THE CONSTITUENTS WHO PROTECTS SUCH MINDLESS EVILS AFTER KNOWING

Tne daily power show off of 3 maddogs.

https://m.facebook.com/614945614/posts/10156819540805615/

Y i chose  San Francisco  loving wp 2day ie on the day David Rees  era terrorism, actually with an intention 2 make, sympathetic 2 a very family oriented  festive day (despite a homosexual jinn brutality creating pain n instigating me on Cameroon, Francis n Obamas order 2 write the facts behind which they hav already created a plot 2 hide their islam hatred n killing me n toll collection torturer commentaries since 730 am thnx 2 cia religious extremists n terrorists), which has been turned in2 a mixture  of filthy rio, nottinghill or hindu puja like processìons.

Is there any difference  between fb n wp? The answer is they both r sorcerers n blog hijackers so they r also part of evil imperialists. They also want 2 show their toll giving sauds n other middle eastern autocratic states who approves judio, hindu n Christians evil powers 2 cling on 2 power that I am possessed  (like their presidents, generals, senators, bankers, ambassadors et al). 

I hav, like most of their deeply crooked acts, no clue y often they hav 2 turn electricity off as was in this case bfor  I was made convinced that I must  write it 2 inform the world wot a sins load bearer monkey god I am.  Now it seems like I hav actually written this 2 technically n very shrewdly show pope francis, camaroon, obama (the genious in making case for killing, torture, forcefully creating environment 2 write  blogs) show them they r innocent in the biggest lies, deceits n immoral acts against humanity mostly muslims.

The  names of 911 creating terrorist bankers under protection frm above named trio criminals:

JOHN REED
SANFORD I WEILL
PETER M GALLANT
DIPAK RASTOGI
ROBERT A ANNIBALE
DAVID GIBSON
ALLEN HIRST
ROBERT E. EICHFIELD
DAVID P CONNER
JAY CHAKRABARTY
NICK LYALL
ED WESS
SUJIT BANERJEE
KEVIN A MURRAY
SRINIVASAN SRIDHAR
DAVID E REES
RAJAN ÀRULANANTHAM
DEVMALAYA DEY     
SELIM BARKAT
J BHASKAR

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RELIGION MADE IN WHITE HOUSE FOR MUSLIMS

Image
23/11/16 edited 17/01/17 Salam. Unabated torturers now since 2 of them r extremely.in luv with each other & their sodomy is being celebrated by their evil jinns thru clever foul mouthing n extra powerful tower bridge acts. 2day the basters were in the patriotic bonday Mataram act when I helped (?) the hypocrits with the video: Then they got finally ticked off 2day after 2 days of being "unable" 2 download from utube Islmic hamd n naats for the bakground theme. More "upset" 2 c the country they want 2 hide not being in the list of utube countries. Then anger erupted 2 the legal challenge from a petty bhogoban requesting 1 liner memo 2 Iblis like complain. The 1st post copy removed. Revenge of the nerds: My apologies 2 those who hav good taste n hates haram, but remember u can't get rid of this vicious n filth fast destroying all sorts of good from this earth smooth evil if u don't know the total ugly face of these
Read more

Dialogue - We Need Extra-Ordinary Imams

Image
02/03/18 A CLASSROOM IN GAZA NON HIJABI MUSLIMAHS BREAKING: CRA to save net neutrality has been introduced https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/3a5ebfe9-980a-46fb-97f8-626128a2139b Reposting after 28/2/18 bcoz: Quite a few important lines disappeared with shrewdly showing continuity of writing. The topic is both hijabi & non hijabi women showing themselves in media, public & elsewhere - aren't they both considered unveiled? According to law when a crime is committed it dosen't look at the dress of the alledged criminal, rather it looks at the circumstantial evidences, witnesses etc. to find out whether a person is guilty or not within the laws applicable. The topic is both hijabi & non hijabi women showing themselves in media, public & elsewhere - aren't they both considered unveiled? According to law when a crime is committed it dosen't look at the dress of the alledged criminal, rather it looks at the circums
Read more